The National Rifle Association—along with the American Suppressor Association, Firearms Policy Coalition, and Second Amendment Foundation—announced the filing of another lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA). The case, Jensen v. ATF, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Originally, the NFA imposed a $200 tax and established a tax-enforcement registration regime for certain classes of firearms. However, President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB) eliminated this tax for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and NFA-defined “any other weapons,” leaving only the registration requirement in place. The complaint in Jensen argues that since the tax has been eliminated, the NFA’s registration regime can no longer be justified under Congress’s taxing power—nor any other authority granted under Article I of the Constitution.
The complaint also asserts that the NFA’s registration regime for suppressors and short-barreled rifles violates the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court has established that any regulation on arms-bearing conduct must be consistent with our nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. And, the complaint argues, there is no tradition that supports the NFA’s registration regime for protected arms such as suppressors and short-barreled rifles.
"Thanks to President Trump and his historic One Big Beautiful Bill, the NRA and gun-rights advocates successfully repealed the unnecessary and burdensome $200 tax imposed on law-abiding citizens through the National Firearms Act," said John Commerford, Executive Director of NRA-ILA. "While the elimination of the NFA tax marked a significant victory, our work is far from over. The NRA will not rest until the National Firearms Act is eliminated in its entirety, and today's filing in Texas marks another critical step in that process."
The plaintiffs in the case include the Texas State Rifle Association, FPC Action Foundation, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Hot Shots Custom LLC, and three individuals. The case represents the second lawsuit brought by the NRA, ASA, FPC, and SAF challenging the NFA since the OBBB eliminated the tax for NFA items, and builds upon Brown v. ATF, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri on August 1.
